Nearly three years have passed since Nicholas Negroponte sketched the idea of a USD 100 laptop for poor school children at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
Ever since and according to a Wall Street Journal article, the OLPC has had a rocky journey.
Negroponte certainly downplayed the role and the political clout of the Wintel alliance; the market capitalisation of Intel and Microsoft combined is USD 452 bn; that more than the GDP of countries like Poland or Taiwan.
Both Intel and Microsoft supremos initially discarded the OLPC as being little more than a toy but then they moved a gear up when they saw the inroads made by the project.
Intel has been particularly active at killing off the OLPC project as pointed out by Charbax Blog.
The Classmate laptop which Intel has been keen in promoting gave birth to the Asus EEE, a GBP 200 sub laptop, which costs 80 percent less than the competition.
The prospect of potentially seeing one billion users moving away to the enemy (Linux and AMD) was sufficient enough for Intel and Microsoft to incur potential losses in order to capture these markets.
A BBC news article even suggests that politicians were unwilling to take the big plunge because "change equals risk".
The problem though is that Politicians are purchasing laptops but not the one built by the Negroponte gang.
But Negroponte himself seems uncertain of the future of OLPC as he declares that "My goal is not selling laptops. OLPC is not in the laptop business. It's in the education business."
All the arguing and debating about the OLPC should not obliterate the fact that the OLPC has been the ultimate catalyst that caused Intel and Microsoft to commit to cheaper and more accessible technologies.