Exactly one year ago, I wrote on how Qualcomm's smartbooks will outgun netbooks but truth be said, I've been thoroughly disappointed by the whole saga ith very little, if any, hope in sight.
On paper, ARM-based netbooks are an exceptionally capable bunch. Derived from their smartphones cousins, they are merely bigger devices with a proper keyboard. As such, they come with a number of features that set them apart from their x86 counterparts.
They're instant on, can last days rather than hours, have built in accelerator, GPS, should make phone calls & 3G modem, all for a very affordable price. The obvious question here is - where are they?
The answer is, we don't know. it's not that they're not out there, we've even managed to get one of them for a review - remember that pink http://www.itproportal.com/portal/reviews/article/2009/8/19/uk-exclusive-preview-pink-pegatron-smartbook/ Pegatron smartbook? That was nearly one year ago!
Yet, there seems to be what some might call a conspiracy, a concerted effort by some of the biggest vendors on the market to push Wintel-based tablet and devices rather than ARMDroid platform, mainly because of "persuasion" techniques from Microsoft and Intel.
Not convinced? Well, most of the products that caught the eye of the press today, from the Eee Tablet to the MSI WindPad were powered by Windows and by Intel. Very little if any Android or ARM-based products in the public eye.
The truth, we suggest might lie elsewhere, in the disruptive effect that ARMDroid could have on the market. As we wrote last year, more ARMDroid manufacturers means more competition and lower prices. As it stands, no one wants a price war and a 10 per cent margin on a $200 Wintel Netbook is always better 5 per cent on a $150 ARMdroid device.